top of page

Remarks on User Safety Assessment, Indicators, and Data

Marco Nutini

Want deeper insights? Most remarks on use cases are exclusive to our subscribers. Here's a sample—subscribe now for full access!


Risk assessment for Product Contamination is, unsurprisingly, a core focus. Typically, this involves ongoing monitoring of contamination indicators and a periodic Monte Carlo simulation that correlates contamination risk with compliance to good manufacturing practices (GMP) indicators.


This is an interesting case: contamination is difficult to detect unless chemical tests clearly expose it. Inspection is both costly and often frustrating. As a result, the best approach is to correlate risk exposure with the level of effort invested in contamination control—there is no good, cost-effective alternative at the moment. Do you agree?


One significant challenge is that data pipelines in the food industry are highly fragmented and disorganized. I believe Agentic AI could dramatically improve this situation by streamlining data collection, integration, and analysis.


On Materiality

A key question: How would Verdenost report this risk in a materiality assessment for sustainability disclosure? Since this is an inside-out materiality issue, it would likely be limited in scope. However, using Monte Carlo simulation outcomes as disclosure parameters could add meaningful depth to the assessment.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Thank You and Webinar Resources

I can’t thank enough those who participated in the March 11 live webinar —your engagement is a major source of motivation for me! I...

Comentarios


CONTACT

Get In Touch

Av. Cassiano Ricardo 601

12246-870

São José dos Campos - SP- Brasil

LOOPNUT CONSULTORIA LTDA.

CNPJ: 17.551.435/0001-27

nutini@riskleap.com
+55 (12) 99121-4336

JOIN THE MAILING LIST

© 2025 by Loopnut. All rights reserved.

bottom of page